5

Appomattox

Appomattox: A Hardfought Surrender

Had it not followed years of death and destruction, Lee’s surrender to Grant would be remembered as a comedy of errors.

Everyone knows about the Surrender at Appomattox:  April 9, 1865. Wilmer McLean’s parlor. Robert E. Lee on time, in an immaculate uniform. Ulysses S. Grant late, in a mud-spattered private’s blouse. Lee not remembering Grant from the Mexican War.  Grant not knowing Confederate soldiers owned their mounts.  Grant writing out terms.  Lee signing them.  Lee riding to tell his army. Grant wiring to tell Lincoln.

What not everyone knows is that the entire surrender process had been a fight against a series of vexing circumstances.

The remnants of the once noble and seemingly invincible Army of Northern Virginia went into battle for the last time on the foggy morning of April 9, 1865.  Surrounded by Federal forces, rebels under General John Gordon sought to break through the Union cavalry line west of Appomattox Court House then flee south to continue fighting with Confederate forces in North Carolina.

Gordon’s seasoned soldiers did penetrate the Union cavalry line, but Gordon reported they had been fought “to a frazzle.” To make matters worse, when the fog lifted, thousands of Federal infantrymen who had arrived during the night could be seen. Hearing that news, Lee saw surrendering as his only reasonable option and thought he knew exactly when and where it would happen.

*****

In a note sent to Lee on April 7, Grant declared the situation of the Army of Northern Virginia “hopeless” and that its surrender would avoid “any further effusion of blood.” In his reply, Lee disagreed with the evaluation of hopelessness but asked Grant to delineate the terms he would propose for surrender. The following day, April 8, Grant set forth standard terms of surrender: “Men and officers shall be disqualified from taking up arms against the government of the United States until properly exchanged.” In addition, he offered to meet Lee at a place of the latter’s convenience. Lee proposed meeting at “10 a.m. on the 9th on the old stage road to Richmond between the picket lines,” but emphasized that he intended only to discuss Grant’s proposal in general.  He added that he was “looking forward to a restoration of  peace.”

Lee, of course, would have cheerfully stood up Grant had Gordon’s breakthrough been successful, but midmorning found him waiting for Grant at the appointed spot east of Appomattox Court House, albeit for a different purpose.  Wanting to prevent more casualties, he set about arranging a short truce with Union forces both in the quiet Confederate rear and at the rebel front, where Gordon’s troops were engaging with Federal infantry.

Lee sent a courier to Gordon, instructing him to inform his Union counterpart of the temporary cessation of hostilities. Gordon instructed one of his staff officers, Colonel Green Peyton, to deliver the message under the traditional symbol of truce, a white flag. But there was a snag:  No flag of truce was available.  Gordon told Peyton to tie his handkerchief onto a stick.  Peyton did not have a handkerchief, and– apparently– neither did Gordon, who instructed Peyton to tear off a piece of his shirt. Peyton pointed out that he, like Gordon and every other man on hand, was wearing flannel.  In his Reminiscenses of the Civil War, Gordon says he then ordered Peyton to “Get something and go!”  An obedient subordinate, Peyton soon approached the Union line under a dingy rag of truce.

The firing west of Appomattox Court House ceased as Lee waited for Grant on the other side of the village.  When a single Union officer appeared with a note from Grant, Lee learned that that he was the one being stood up. Grant had misinterpreted his reference to “restoration of peace” as meaning Lee expected him to act in a political, rather than a military, capacity.  Not wishing to exceed his authority, Grant simply declined the invitation.  Lee had no choice but write Grant another note indicating his desire to meet solely for the purpose of surrendering the Army of Northern Virginia.

Time passed as Grant, who was riding toward the front along the far-flung Union perimeter, was located and more notes were exchanged. Lee rested under an apple tree until Colonel Orville Babcock, one of Grant’s staff officers, delivered the message Lee was awaiting.  Grant apologized for its tardiness– he had not received Lee’s offer to surrender until nearly noon– but said he was on his way.  He charged Lee with finding an appropriate meeting place.

Lee asked two staff officers, Colonels Walter Taylor and Charles Marshall, to accompany him to the surrender, but Taylor protested, pleading exhaustion.* Lee showed compassion for the young man and excused him, then asked Marshall to locate an appropriate meeting place within the village.  Marshall secured the use of the home of Wilmer McLean, the most imposing house in the village.

The home of Wilmer McLean earned a spot in American history as the site of Lee's surrender to Grant at Appomattox.

The home of Wilmer McLean earned a spot in American history as the site of Lee’s surrender to Grant at Appomattox.

Lee, Marshall, and Babcock sat in McLean’s front parlor for half an hour before Grant arrived around 1:30, accompanied by numerous staff and field officers.  As was so often the case during his stint as head of the ANV, Lee found himself outnumbered by the Union.
Following some perfunctory small talk, Grant, sitting at a small marble-topped table, opened his order book and began writing the terms for surrender in pencil. He wrote quickly; when he was finished, he asked Colonel Ely Parker of his staff to help him proofread the two pages.  According to Horace Porter, another of Grant’s staff officers who later wrote a detailed account of the surrender, Grant and Parker made a few minor changes before the letter was handed to Lee, who sat at another small table.
Lee put on his wire-rimmed glasses and began to read.  He soon noted an omission Grant and Parker had overlooked. When Grant confirmed that he had intended to include the word, Lee volunteered to insert it. However, he could not find a pencil.  He had donned his last clean uniform that morning and neglected to stock his pockets.  Horace Porter noted Lee’s fruitless searching and handed his own pencil to the general. Lee made the correction and verbally agreed to Grant’s terms.
Grant gave the corrected document to Colonel T. S. Bowers, instructing him to make a formal copy in ink.  Bowers was intimidated by the request and handed the draft off like a hot potato to Parker.** His reasoning was that the imperfect proofreader had better penmanship.
Parker went to another small table to begin writing, but he had no ink.  Host Wilmer McLean produced what Porter describes as “a conical-shaped stoneware inkstand” that was soon found to contain no useable ink.  At this point the Confederacy proved to have superior resources:  Colonel Marshall pulled a small inkstand from his pocket and gave it to Parker.
As Parker penned the formal copy of the surrender terms, Lee asked Marshall to draft– presumably in pencil– a letter of acceptance of those terms for Lee to sign.  Lee made some changes and ordered Marshall to make a final inked copy. Parker had apparently returned Marshall’s ink, but Marshall had run out of paper. This time it was the Union that had the resources and, according to Porter, “gave a few pages to the colonel.”
After years as adversaries,  the Army of the Potomac and the Army of Northern Virginia ended their war as collaborators.
_____
*, ** See earlier post “Opting out at Appomattox”

5 Responses to “Appomattox: A Hardfought Surrender”

  1. David Connon says:

    Hi, Pat.

    I enjoyed reading your post about Appomattox. Nice job!

  2. Ian Granstra says:

    Great article. Very interesting and well-written. I had not heard that before.

  3. John Bamberl says:

    Great blog site. Why didn’t you tell me about it before?

  4. Fred Wileman says:

    Nice article, Pat. Just imagine what would have happened had the host not had a supply of ink! I have also wished that someone would trace the post-surrender life of the furniture pieces from that parlor; apparently Union officers bought or took most of the furniture. Maybe some of it can be found in Iowa? Or not. Anyway, “From backyard to parlor: the Civil War as I saw it” is a piece that should have been written.

  5. Pat says:

    Fred, three pieces of furniture are held by the Smithsonian: the caned chair Lee used while signing, the chair Grant used, and a small wooden table. The latter is the one Sheridan “acquired” (he said bought; the McLeans claimed nothing was purchased) and gave to Libby Custer who loaned it to the museum and bequeathed it in her will. The marble-topped table at which Lee sat while Grant drafted the surrender terms became the possession of General Ord and wound up in the Chicago History Museum but is rarely displayed. (I think Ord may have offered it to Julia Grant at one point, but she declined it.) Most of the items in the McLean house today are replicas, but a few things are supposed to be authentic to the signing. Even the house itself is something of a replica. The original was dismantled in the late 1800s in preparation for its being shipped north where it would be reassembled and used as a fundraising attraction. The move never happened, and the National Park Service rebuilt the home decades later. Don’t know how much– if any– of the original materials were used.
    This link contains more specific information about the Smithsonian holdings: http://www.civilwar.si.edu/appomattox_furniture.html.

Leave a Reply